In partnership with

What’s New This Week

Good morning, this week, as the political landscape continues to shift, we’re zeroing in on the latest moves shaking North American relations, trade, and immigration. From Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy triggering economic ripples across border communities to a shocking proposal to use Guantanamo Bay for mass deportations, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Plus, we spotlight Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s bold response to U.S. tariffs and examine how Trump’s growing alliance with Elon Musk could reshape both policy and technology.

First time reading? Join thousands of intellectually curious readers. Sign up here.

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Upgrade your news intake with 1440! Dive into a daily newsletter trusted by millions for its comprehensive, 5-minute snapshot of the world's happenings. We navigate through over 100 sources to bring you fact-based news on politics, business, and culture—minus the bias and absolutely free.

Subscribe to 1440 today.

The Quick Courier

Trade Winds

From the Nogales Arizona Gateway to National Policy: Navigating Tariffs and Cross-Border Commerce

For decades, the small border city of Nogales, Arizona, has operated as a vital economic gateway. Growing up and eventually serving as mayor there, I witnessed firsthand how international commerce can invigorate local communities—or leave them vulnerable to policy shifts. Today, with new tariffs imposed on Mexico, Canada, and China, I see some striking parallels to earlier trade disruptions, and I’m convinced we need to scrutinize how these measures impact not just the macro economy, but also communities on the front lines.

The Border’s Beating Heart

Nogales, like many border cities, survives and thrives on trade. We watch cargo trucks loaded with produce, car parts, and countless consumer goods crisscross the boundary day in and day out. These flows aren’t abstract. They mean jobs for the local workforce, customers for local businesses, and vital tax revenue for municipal projects. When tariffs go up, that once-steady stream of commerce can slow to a trickle—and communities along the border feel the pinch in everything from grocery prices to small business operations.

Power Move

Mapping America’s Top Trade Partners Amid New Tariffs

A striking new map from the U.S. Census Bureau shows how heavily states rely on three major partners—Canada, Mexico, and China—for their imports. Altogether, these trade relationships influence roughly 42 states and are worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Now, with the Trump administration imposing a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, plus a 10% tariff on goods from China, we’re entering choppy waters for cross-border commerce.

What stands out immediately is Canada’s dominance throughout the Midwest and Northeast, accounting for upwards of 50% to 80% of total imports in states like Montana, Maine, and Oklahoma. This underscores the highly integrated supply chains linking U.S. industries—especially automotive, energy, and agriculture—to Canada’s. Meanwhile, Mexico captures a huge share of imports in border states like Texas (40%) and Arizona (28%), pointing to thriving manufacturing and produce sectors. China, though not the top partner for as many states, still wields massive influence in high-volume regions such as California, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

The administration’s justification for these tariffs ties back to ongoing disputes over illegal immigration, plus the flow of opioid fentanyl and precursor chemicals traveling through Canada and Mexico from China. But it’s not just about security; these tariffs are also intended as a hardline tactic to force renegotiations and bring manufacturing back to the United States. While the intention is to pressure exporters abroad, the immediate reality is that states—especially those with high import shares—are bracing for price hikes and potential retaliatory measures. Supply chains built around just-in-time delivery could face delays, higher costs, and inevitable uncertainty.

In states where Canada or Mexico already supplies over a quarter of total imports, the new tariffs could sting local industries and consumers. Take Michigan, reliant on Mexican supply chains for vehicles and parts, or Montana, which sources 86% of its imports from Canada. Businesses may attempt to pass extra costs to consumers—meaning higher price tags on everything from cars to groceries. The flipside is that tariffs are occasionally used as leverage: If negotiations lead to relaxed security concerns or improved trade agreements, the White House could pivot and reduce the rates.

For now, American businesses are caught between strategic policy goals and on-the-ground realities. This newly released map offers a snapshot of how reliant each state is on these top partners, and it also foreshadows potential headaches for those hoping to avoid tangles in global supply chains. The stakes of these tariffs—and their eventual outcomes—will likely echo far beyond any single border crossing.

The Border Buzz

Mass Deportations to Guantanamo Bay?

Amid the ongoing immigration debate, a controversial proposal from the Trump administration has raised eyebrows: using Guantanamo Bay as a hub for mass deportations. While the president’s move suggests a novel solution, the truth is that these facilities have been in place for years—long before his announcement. During my time as Chief of Staff at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, I visited Guantanamo Bay and observed firsthand the infrastructure already in operation. The idea isn’t new or unprecedented; the site has historically been used for detention, though mostly in the context of national security rather than mass civil immigration proceedings.

Yet the pitfalls are considerable. Housing large numbers of immigrants at Guantanamo Bay would be extraordinarily costly, involving significant logistical and administrative overhead to transport detainees, deploy staff, and maintain adequate living conditions on a remote base. What’s more, civil rights and due process concerns loom large; any missteps could tarnish America’s global reputation. If the U.S. appears cavalier about basic legal protections for noncitizens, it risks eroding trust, inviting international criticism, and potentially placing American travelers or expats at risk of reciprocal treatment abroad.

Of course, it can be done—as long as strict procedural safeguards are in place to ensure humane conditions and a fair, transparent adjudication process. But Guantanamo Bay is a sensitive symbol worldwide. The administration must tread carefully to avoid turning a well-known military installation into a flashpoint for human rights debates that overshadow what could otherwise be a legitimate enforcement option. Ultimately, balancing robust immigration control with America’s longstanding commitment to due process remains the central challenge—and any steps taken at Guantanamo Bay will serve as a highly visible test of our national character.

Power Poll

Join the Conversation

Thanks for reading this edition of my newsletter! I'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts about what you think are the most critical issues that need to be addressed. Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on social media using the hashtag #Intermestic.

Stay Informed, Stay Connected!

• Subscribe to my blog at www.marcolopez.com.

• Follow me on X, LinkedIn, and Facebook for the latest news and updates.

• Share this newsletter with your network and help spread the word!

Let's keep the conversation going!