This week made one thing clear: North America is being tested. The Supreme Court recalibrated tariff authority. Mexico struck decisively against cartel leadership. Immigration enforcement remains under scrutiny in the United States. And as the world prepares for the largest World Cup in history, our region will soon host millions under a global spotlight. These are not isolated stories. They are signals about institutional strength, coordination, and whether we are prepared for sustained pressure.

First time reading? Join thousands of intellectually curious readers. Sign up here.

The Supreme Court’s decision limiting unilateral tariff authority under emergency powers marks a pivotal moment in American trade governance.

The ruling reinforces that tariff authority ultimately resides with Congress. It narrows executive flexibility and restores constitutional balance. But it does not eliminate tariffs as a tool. It changes how they will be deployed.

Expect more targeted tariffs under Section 301 and Section 232 authorities. Expect more litigation. Expect slower processes and more political negotiation.

For markets and governments, this introduces a new phase of structured uncertainty.

Diversify exposure legally, not just geographically.
Trade frameworks should include contingency mechanisms for sudden tariff shifts.

Strengthen regional agreements.
USMCA now becomes even more important as a stabilizing anchor. Although I think this is likely going to become a bi-lateral agreement if tensions continue between the US and Canada.

Prepare for sector-specific enforcement.
Autos, semiconductors, critical minerals, and advanced manufacturing remain exposed to targeted action.

Stress test pricing models.
Build scenarios where tariffs appear, disappear, or get tied up in court for months.

Increase North American integration.
Nearshoring remains one of the strongest hedges against global volatility.

Invest in trade intelligence and compliance.
Monitoring legal developments is no longer optional. It is a competitive advantage.

The ruling restores constitutional structure. But it does not restore predictability.

Countries and companies should build resilience now. The winners in this next cycle will not be those waiting for clarity. They will be those designing for volatility.

Amid trade rulings and security recalibration, North America quietly delivered something powerful on the global stage.

At the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina, the United States and Canada once again demonstrated the depth of their winter sports systems.

The United States secured one of its strongest Winter Games performances in history, leading in gold medals and finishing near the top overall. From freestyle skiing and snowboarding to figure skating and hockey, American athletes showed the results of sustained investment and generational talent development.

Canada delivered its customary strength in hockey, speed skating, and alpine disciplines, reinforcing its reputation as one of the world’s premier winter sport nations.

Mexico did not reach the podium this year, but its athletes competed — an important reminder that winter sports require geography, infrastructure, and long-term institutional investment. Participation itself reflects commitment in a discipline where climate and facilities matter enormously.

There is a broader lesson here.

Medals are not accidental.

They are the visible outcome of invisible systems — youth pipelines, coaching networks, sports science, funding structures, and national strategy.

Regions that invest consistently in systems outperform over time.

North America’s winter dominance is not about cold weather alone. It is about sustained preparation.

As we move toward the World Cup and later the Los Angeles 2028 Summer Olympics, this performance reinforces something important:

When the United States and Canada invest in infrastructure and development, they deliver results.

That principle applies beyond sport.

Systems matter. Long-term thinking matters. Preparation wins.

And this week, on snow and ice, North America showed what that looks like.

Yesterday, Mexican security forces killed cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, “El Mencho”, ending his operational command after years of violence and narcotics exportation.

This moment is not something to celebrate about a person’s death — he was a human being — but it is a significant operational milestone in a long struggle against powerful criminal networks.

What makes it meaningful is this:

• It reflects decisive action after years of impunity.
• It reflects cooperation between Mexican authorities and U.S. intelligence.
• It represents a departure from passive policy frameworks of the last Mexican administration.

The previous approach allowed criminal power to grow; this action signals a return to law-enforcement pressure and collaboration.

The real challenge now is turning a tactical victory into strategic progress. President Sheinbaum must sustain pressure, deepen institutional reforms, and ensure that cartel fragmentation doesn’t lead to escalated community violence.

And the United States must continue joint operations, information sharing, and border enforcement coordination.

This is a moment of responsibility, not triumph.

The 2026 World Cup will not happen in a vacuum.

It will unfold in a region confronting serious internal pressures.

In Mexico, cartel violence and recent high-level enforcement actions have exposed both progress and fragility in the security environment. In the United States, ICE enforcement behavior remains politically charged and internationally scrutinized.

That is the backdrop.

And that is precisely why FIFA 2026 matters.

This will be the largest World Cup in history. Three countries. Multiple border crossings. Millions of visitors. Billions watching.

The tournament becomes more than sport.

It becomes a test of institutional maturity.

• Mexico must demonstrate sustained security stabilization beyond tactical operations.
• The United States must calibrate immigration enforcement in a way that protects public safety without creating international perception problems.
• All three host nations must operate as a unified security architecture, not parallel bureaucracies.

Visitors will not distinguish between federal agencies. They will judge the experience holistically.

A heavy-handed approach damages reputation.
A lax approach invites risk.

The balance must be deliberate.

Handled correctly, FIFA 2026 can:

• Showcase real U.S.–Mexico cooperation after years of tension
• Demonstrate that enforcement and hospitality are not mutually exclusive
• Send a global message that North America can manage security without instability

Major sporting events amplify whatever a region is experiencing.

If cartel pressure decreases and cross-border coordination improves, the World Cup becomes a symbol of recovery and professionalism.

If domestic enforcement chaos dominates headlines, the event risks becoming politicized.

This is not just about stadium security.

It is about signaling.

The world will see how North America handles pressure.

FIFA 2026 is not merely a tournament.

It is a global audit of governance.

Thanks for reading this edition of my newsletter! I'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts about what you think are the most critical issues that need to be addressed. Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on social media using the hashtag #Intermestic.

Stay Informed, Stay Connected!

Let's keep the conversation going!