In partnership with

What’s New This Week

Good morning, this week, we’re diving into the high-stakes battles reshaping U.S.-Mexico relations—from lawsuits targeting American gunmakers to the evolving fight against cartels and fentanyl trafficking. With Mexico suing U.S. firearms manufacturers and both the U.S. and Canada designating cartels as terrorist organizations, the legal and economic implications could be far-reaching. Meanwhile, President Trump’s border shutdown declaration is sparking major trade and diplomatic concerns. As these developments unfold, we explore their impact on security, commerce, and the future of North America’s economic integration.

First time reading? Join thousands of intellectually curious readers. Sign up here.

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Upgrade your news intake with 1440! Dive into a daily newsletter trusted by millions for its comprehensive, 5-minute snapshot of the world's happenings. We navigate through over 100 sources to bring you fact-based news on politics, business, and culture—minus the bias and absolutely free.

Subscribe to 1440 today.

The Quick Courier

Trade Winds

Unlocking Potential—How Smarter Immigration Policies Could Fortify Social Security and Medicare

Immigrants play a crucial yet often overlooked role in supporting Social Security and Medicare. Many pay billions of dollars into these programs every year but remain ineligible to collect benefits later on. For instance, it’s estimated that in 2013 alone, undocumented workers contributed about $13 billion to Social Security—funds that help keep the system afloat without ever returning to those who paid in. As America’s population ages, creating clear pathways to enable long-term participation by immigrants could bring greater stability to these vital programs.

Immigrants Already Contribute—Even Without Benefits

Current rules mean that many immigrants, particularly those without a path to lawful status, pay Social Security and Medicare taxes through payroll deductions but can’t claim benefits. Seasonal agricultural workers, for example, often pay into the system for years. But if they never gain a valid Social Security Number, they won’t have access to retirement or disability benefits in the future.

Power Move

Curbing the Flow: Mexico’s Landmark Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers

A New Legal Strategy

Mexico’s bold lawsuit against prominent U.S. gun manufacturers marks a major shift in the transnational fight against violent cartels. By alleging that these companies knowingly fuel arms trafficking south of the border, Mexico is challenging an industry often shielded by powerful American gun lobbies. If successful, the lawsuit could create legal and financial repercussions for gun sellers, compelling them to adopt stricter screening and tracking measures.

Guns and Drugs: A Deadly Nexus

For years, unchecked weapon flows have emboldened criminal organizations in Mexico, contributing to rampant violence and destabilizing entire regions. This violence, in turn, feeds the cross-border drug trade that persists due to unrelenting American demand. The interdependence between guns and drugs is unmistakable: heavily armed cartels secure territories, smuggle illicit substances, and terrorize local communities.

Terrorist Designations and Legal Fallout

Historically, individuals or organizations labeled as “terrorists” face severe legal consequences. The U.S. has targeted banks accused of financing Middle Eastern terror groups, subjecting them to staggering fines and strict oversight. Similarly, tech platforms that hosted extremist content have paid hefty penalties, reinforcing that enabling or profiting from terrorist activities can come at a steep cost.

Now, with both the U.S. and Canada designating Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations, new avenues for legal action and asset freezes may emerge. If gun sellers are seen as knowingly or recklessly supplying weapons to these cartels, they too risk being caught in the web of anti-terror legislation. Such measures would expose them to criminal and civil liabilities, profoundly changing how firearms are marketed, sold, and tracked in the United States.

The Road Ahead

Ultimately, this lawsuit and the broader terrorist designations put a spotlight on an urgent, interconnected crisis. Curtailing weapons flows into Mexico is not merely a matter of border security—it’s about undermining criminal networks that rely on U.S. firearms to sustain power. By enforcing greater accountability, the outcome could reshape corporate conduct, bolster cooperation between North American governments, and help weaken the violent grip of the cartels on both sides of the border.

The Border Buzz

Fentanyl, Guns, and the Cross-Border Blame Game

The fentanyl crisis has become a defining issue in U.S.-Mexico relations, with both nations blaming each other for the devastating consequences. In the U.S., policymakers and law enforcement point to Mexican cartels as the primary suppliers of the deadly opioid, responsible for tens of thousands of American overdose deaths each year. Meanwhile, Mexican officials argue that the real problem originates in the United States—not just with demand, but with the steady flow of American-made firearms that arm these criminal organizations.

This cycle of blame reflects a deeper challenge: both fentanyl and guns fuel violence and instability, yet each country views the crisis from its own lens. While the U.S. focuses on stopping fentanyl at the border and cracking down on cartel operations, Mexico is taking legal action against U.S. gun manufacturers, holding them accountable for arming the very groups responsible for drug trafficking.

The reality is that fentanyl production and gun trafficking are deeply interconnected. Cartels rely on American firearms to enforce control over drug routes, intimidate rivals, and fight off security forces. Without easy access to high-powered weapons, their ability to operate at such a massive scale would be severely weakened. Likewise, as long as fentanyl demand remains high in the U.S., these criminal enterprises will continue profiting—whether through synthetic opioids or other illicit trades.

The recent terrorist designations of Mexican cartels by both the U.S. and Canada add another layer of complexity. Will this lead to new legal tools to target arms dealers and drug networks? Or will it deepen tensions, making cooperation more difficult?

If there is a path forward, it starts with mutual accountability. The U.S. must do more to regulate the flow of weapons, while Mexico must intensify its efforts to dismantle fentanyl production. Both nations share responsibility for this crisis—and only by working together can they truly curb the violence that threatens communities on both sides of the border.

Power Poll

Join the Conversation

Thanks for reading this edition of my newsletter! I'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts about what you think are the most critical issues that need to be addressed. Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on social media using the hashtag #Intermestic.

Stay Informed, Stay Connected!

• Subscribe to my blog at www.marcolopez.com.

• Follow me on X, LinkedIn, and Facebook for the latest news and updates.

• Share this newsletter with your network and help spread the word!

Let's keep the conversation going!