The Power Courier
Posts
🛃⚔️ Crackdowns, Cartel Terrorist & Border Risks

🛃⚔️ Crackdowns, Cartel Terrorist & Border Risks

Visa bans with no explanation, cartels labeled as terrorists, and ICE lowering the bar — security and trust in North America face a defining test.

Marco Lopez
August 11, 2025

In partnership with

What’s New This Week

Good morning, this week, visa bans on high-profile politicians spark unease over transparency, Trump’s terrorist designation of Mexican cartels forces a high-stakes security reckoning, and ICE’s lowered hiring standards threaten to worsen an already troubled agency. We dig into what these moves mean for North America’s trust, security, and investment climate.

First time reading? Join thousands of intellectually curious readers. Sign up here.

Inside Special Sections

Trade Winds: Visa revocations target high-profile politicians, but without transparency, could they undermine diplomacy and commerce?
Power Move: Trump’s terrorist designation of major Mexican cartels raises stakes for Mexico’s security, credibility, and investment climate.
The Border Buzz: ICE lowers hiring standards despite a history of abuse and weak oversight — what this means for enforcement and public trust.

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Join for free today!

The Quick Courier

⚔️ Trump Orders Pentagon Into Cartel Fight
Trump secretly directs Pentagon to develop military options against Latin American cartels — a dramatic escalation with legal and diplomatic flashpoints.

🛑 Sheinbaum: “No Invasion”
Mexico’s president flatly rejects any possibility of a U.S. military invasion after reports of Trump’s secret military order—insisting collaboration, never intervention.

🏪 Walmart’s $6B Mexico Bet
Retail giant commits $6 billion to boost local production, upgrade logistics, and deepen supply chains in Mexico.

🤝 Premier Smith’s Mexico Mission
Alberta’s Premier heads to Mexico City aiming to bolster trade, energy, and agriculture ties during a high-stakes trade mission.

📜 “Invasion” Triggers Outrage
Invasion claims ignite backlash, highlighting the dangerous sway of reckless, sensationalist rhetoric.

👶 Trump Targets Child Protections
Administration moves to end limits on detaining migrant children, drawing sharp judicial scrutiny.

⚡ EV Tax Credit Frenzy
A last-minute rush for the $7,500 federal EV tax credit sends delivery estimates soaring from weeks to months — and could leave the industry facing a steep crash once the incentive vanishes.

Trade Winds

Visa Revocations: Necessary Tool or Unsettling Signal?

Visa Under Review

In recent months, the U.S. has stepped up its use of visa revocations against foreign politicians — particularly in Latin America — suspected of corruption, organized crime ties, or undermining democratic institutions. On paper, it’s a powerful diplomatic tool: send a clear message that those who abuse power will not be welcomed. For decades, the U.S. has used targeted visa bans to pressure individuals and signal disapproval without resorting to full sanctions.

The difference now is speed and scope. Cases are emerging where visas are pulled with little public explanation, leaving allies, partners, and observers wondering whether decisions are based on solid evidence or political considerations. That uncertainty, while not yet targeting the business community, is beginning to create unease among investors and officials who regularly engage in cross-border work. Even the perception of arbitrary action can deter people from traveling, meeting, or collaborating — all of which are vital to commerce and diplomacy.

From an anti-corruption standpoint, revocations are most effective when they are precise, transparent, and justified. Without clear criteria and communication, they risk undermining trust, not only in Washington’s intentions but in the stability of North American partnerships.

The path forward should include a more formalized, transparent review process for high-profile revocations, coupled with public statements that explain the rationale without compromising intelligence sources. This approach would protect the integrity of the tool, maintain its deterrent effect, and reassure legitimate actors that the rules are fair.

The goal is simple: wield the visa ban as a scalpel, not a sledgehammer — ensuring it remains a credible instrument of policy while safeguarding the cross-border trust that keeps our region’s tourism, investment, and diplomacy thriving.

Power Move

Trump’s Terrorist Designation of Mexican Cartels: A Turning Point for Security and Investment

Cartels Under Fire

In January, President Trump signed an executive order classifying major Mexican cartels — including the Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation Cartel — as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). This is a legal shift with real teeth. Unlike traditional drug trafficking charges, FTO status brings the full weight of U.S. counterterrorism powers: asset freezes, criminal penalties for anyone providing material support, travel bans, and the potential use of military or intelligence resources.

The process is formal and significant. The U.S. Secretary of State recommends the designation, based on evidence that the group engages in terrorist activity and poses a threat to U.S. nationals or national security. Once listed, these organizations are treated under U.S. law in the same category as groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS — a symbolic and operational upgrade in the fight against them.

President Claudia Sheinbaum’s public stance has been clear: Mexico will not accept U.S. military intervention. But the designation changes the dynamic. It forces action by raising the stakes — both diplomatically and economically. Any inaction risks damaging Mexico’s credibility with investors and trading partners.

On my last trip to Mexico, I heard directly from business leaders and everyday citizens who quietly support the move. Many believe entrenched collusion between cartels and certain authorities has eroded trust for years. Breaking this nexus is critical if Mexico wants to accelerate growth, attract foreign capital, and build investor confidence.

This designation isn’t just about law enforcement. It’s about reshaping Mexico’s security environment to unlock its full economic potential. It’s a blunt instrument, yes — but it may be the necessary catalyst for lasting change.

📌 Sidebar

What “Foreign Terrorist Organization” Status Means

Definition:
An FTO is a group formally identified by the U.S. government as engaging in terrorist activity that threatens U.S. nationals or national security.

How It’s Done:

Step 1: Intelligence agencies gather evidence.
Step 2: The Secretary of State makes a formal recommendation.
Step 3: The designation is published in the Federal Register and becomes law.

Consequences:

All U.S.-based assets are frozen.
Providing any form of support becomes a federal crime.
Members are barred from entering the U.S.
Opens the door for military, intelligence, and counterterrorism tools to be used.

The Border Buzz

ICE’s New Low Standards: Lowering the Bar on an Agency Already in Crisis

ICE In Question

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency — better known as ICE — is a division of the Department of Homeland Security tasked with enforcing immigration laws, dismantling criminal networks, and handling deportations. It operates in two main branches: Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

But ICE’s track record is far from spotless. Over the years, the agency has been dogged by scandals:

Abuse and neglect in detention facilities — documented cases of medical negligence, unsanitary conditions, and mistreatment of detainees, including minors.
Unlawful surveillance — reports of ICE using facial recognition and data-mining tools without warrants or judicial oversight.
Targeting the wrong people — citizens and legal residents mistakenly detained, with some cases leading to wrongful deportations.
Retaliation against activists and whistleblowers — credible claims of ICE going after those who criticize its policies.

Now, the agency is slashing hiring standards in an attempt to fill 10,000 new positions quickly. Age limits are gone, applicants as young as 18 are eligible, and those with “relevant experience” could see their months-long training compressed into just weeks — or even completed online.

If ICE’s oversight and professionalism are already in question, what happens when we add a flood of undertrained, possibly underqualified agents into the mix? Here’s what I fear:

Increased abuse of authority — more wrongful detentions, raids without due process, and profiling based on appearance or language.
Escalating human rights violations — undertrained agents making high-stakes decisions with little understanding of legal limits.
Corruption risk — a weaker vetting process opening the door to recruits with criminal ties or extremist sympathies.
Public trust collapse — fewer people willing to cooperate with investigations or report crimes out of fear.

ICE is already a mess. Weakening its hiring and training pipeline doesn’t just fail to fix the problem — it risks making the agency more dangerous, less accountable, and even harder to reform.

If we want real border and immigration enforcement that’s lawful, effective, and respected, the solution isn’t lowering the bar. It’s raising it — with stronger oversight, higher training standards, and a culture that values rights and the rule of law as much as enforcement.

Power Poll

Do you believe the U.S. should create a more streamlined legal pathway for immigrant workers in essential industries like agriculture and manufacturing?

Immigrant workers are vital to the U.S. economy, yet policies remain outdated. Should the U.S. create a clearer legal pathway or tighten restrictions? Vote now!

Join the Conversation

Thanks for reading this edition of my newsletter! I'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts about what you think are the most critical issues that need to be addressed. Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on social media using the hashtag #Intermestic.