{{Firstname|Good morning}}, this week, America crossed a line. With bombs dropped on Iran’s nuclear facilities, the U.S. has entered a dangerous new war in the Middle East—igniting fears of regional retaliation, energy shocks, and another chapter of forever conflict. Meanwhile, at home and across our hemisphere, we weigh the meaning of global competition, economic resilience, and border security in a world on edge.

First time reading? Join thousands of intellectually curious readers. Sign up here.

Instead, Ground News shows you how left, center, and right-leaning outlets are covering the same story—so you can easily compare reporting and get a well-rounded perspective on the issues that matter to you.

Join 1M+ readers from all political persuasions who use Ground News to see the news, the world, and themselves a little clearer.

Start your free trial today

As North America prepares to host the 2026 World Cup, we’re celebrating more than just a game—we’re investing in infrastructure, tourism, and a spirit of international unity. With the U.S., Mexico, and Canada teaming up, this event is a powerful statement about shared values and a shared future.

But there’s a wildcard in the same year: the Enhanced Games, a new pro-doping athletic competition set to debut in Las Vegas. Backed by tech billionaires and political insiders, the Enhanced Games throws out traditional anti-doping rules and pays up to $1 million for world records. One swimmer already broke a world-best time in a private trial—while on steroids.

It’s an experiment in radical freedom, marketed as “science meets sport.” Some see it as the future. Others, including international athletic bodies, are calling it a reckless spectacle.

Here’s the contrast:
The World Cup is collaboration. The Enhanced Games are disruption.
One is about countries working together. The other is about individuals pushing limits—rules optional.

For me, it raises a bigger question:
What kind of competition do we want to promote—one that unites us, or one that redefines the rules entirely?

As we get closer to 2026, it’s a question worth asking—not just for athletes, but for investors, policymakers, and everyone shaping what comes next.

When farmers rally for immigration reform, you know something is deeply off. The recent protests by U.S. agricultural producers—who rely heavily on immigrant labor—expose a reality that extends far beyond the fields.

Right now, crops are rotting, construction sites sit idle, and restaurants can’t fill shifts. Why? Because the U.S. immigration system is outdated, overly complex, and totally mismatched with today’s labor market.

The same forces squeezing farms are hitting manufacturing lines, tourism hubs, elder care facilities, and hospitals. Demand for workers is growing—but legal pathways to fill those jobs haven’t evolved. Instead of modernizing visas or building binational workforce pipelines, we’re seeing political grandstanding and inaction.

This isn’t just a humanitarian issue. It’s an economic emergency.

The U.S. and Mexico should be building workforce coalitions, not border walls. Reforming immigration—particularly for essential industries—would strengthen trade, support growth, and increase competitiveness in a rapidly shifting global economy.

The power move? Ditch the partisan noise. Build a legal immigration system that reflects economic reality. Our future depends on it.

The cartels aren’t just recruiting—they’re outsourcing. According to new reports, Colombian ex-soldiers, many trained in special forces and counterinsurgency, are now working for Mexico’s Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG). They’re being used not just as hitmen, but as trainers—bringing battlefield tactics to street wars and drug routes.

This isn’t just a Mexican problem. It’s a hemispheric security shift.

Colombian mercenaries have a long history of working in conflict zones—Yemen, Haiti, Iraq. Now they’re flowing into Mexico, with U.S. intelligence officials quietly tracking how this may affect cartel operations along the U.S. border. Think: more disciplined armed cells, more brutal enforcement, and more sophisticated cross-border strategies.

It’s also a wake-up call for our political debate.

Washington keeps arguing over walls, deportations, and fentanyl test strips. But while that debate drags on, cartels are building private armies with global talent pipelines. If that doesn’t redefine what “border security” needs to mean in 2025, what will?

To be clear: more military training on the cartel side doesn’t just mean more violence in Mexico—it means more risk to U.S. agents, ports of entry, and even local law enforcement in places like Arizona and Texas.

The border buzz this week? It’s no longer just about drugs or migration. It’s about who controls the battlefield—and how prepared we are for a fight we no longer fully understand.

Thanks for reading this edition of my newsletter! I'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts about what you think are the most critical issues that need to be addressed. Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on social media using the hashtag #Intermestic.

Stay Informed, Stay Connected!

Let's keep the conversation going!